Dokument: Normal cohorts in automated brain atrophy estimation: how many healthy subjects to include?

Titel:Normal cohorts in automated brain atrophy estimation: how many healthy subjects to include?
URL für Lesezeichen:https://docserv.uni-duesseldorf.de/servlets/DocumentServlet?id=67994
URN (NBN):urn:nbn:de:hbz:061-20241218-124443-4
Kollektion:Publikationen
Sprache:Englisch
Dokumententyp:Wissenschaftliche Texte » Artikel, Aufsatz
Medientyp:Text
Autoren: Rubbert, Christian [Autor]
Wolf, Luisa [Autor]
Vach, Marius [Autor]
Ivan, Vivien Lorena [Autor]
Hedderich, Dennis M. [Autor]
Gaser, Christian [Autor]
Dahnke, Robert [Autor]
Caspers, Julian [Autor]
Dateien:
[Dateien anzeigen]Adobe PDF
[Details]1,64 MB in einer Datei
[ZIP-Datei erzeugen]
Dateien vom 18.12.2024 / geändert 18.12.2024
Stichwörter:Atrophy, Brain, Neurodegenerative diseases, Image processing (computer-assisted), Magnetic resonance imaging
Beschreibung:Objectives

This study investigates the influence of normal cohort (NC) size and the impact of different NCs on automated MRI-based brain atrophy estimation.
Methods

A pooled NC of 3945 subjects (NCpool) was retrospectively created from five publicly available cohorts. Voxel-wise gray matter volume atrophy maps were calculated for 48 Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients (55–82 years) using veganbagel and dynamic normal templates with an increasing number of healthy subjects randomly drawn from NCpool (initially three, and finally 100 subjects). Over 100 repeats of the process, the mean over a voxel-wise standard deviation of gray matter z-scores was established and plotted against the number of subjects in the templates. The knee point of these curves was defined as the minimum number of subjects required for consistent brain atrophy estimation. Atrophy maps were calculated using each NC for AD patients and matched healthy controls (HC). Two readers rated the extent of mesiotemporal atrophy to discriminate AD/HC.
Results

The maximum knee point was at 15 subjects. For 21 AD/21 HC, a sufficient number of subjects were available in each NC for validation. Readers agreed on the AD diagnosis in all cases (Kappa for the extent of atrophy, 0.98). No differences in diagnoses between NCs were observed (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.91; Cochran’s Q, p = 0.19).
Conclusion

At least 15 subjects should be included in age- and sex-specific normal templates for consistent brain atrophy estimation. In the study’s context, qualitative interpretation of regional atrophy allows reliable AD diagnosis with a high inter-reader agreement, irrespective of the NC used.
Clinical relevance statement

The influence of normal cohorts (NCs) on automated brain atrophy estimation, typically comparing individual scans to NCs, remains largely unexplored. Our study establishes the minimum number of NC-subjects needed and demonstrates minimal impact of different NCs on regional atrophy estimation.
Rechtliche Vermerke:Originalveröffentlichung:
Rubbert, C., Wolf, L., Vach, M., Ivan, V. L., Hedderich, D. M., Gaser, C., Dahnke, R., & Caspers, J. (2024). Normal cohorts in automated brain atrophy estimation: how many healthy subjects to include? European Radiology, 34(8), 5276–5286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-10522-5
Lizenz:Creative Commons Lizenzvertrag
Dieses Werk ist lizenziert unter einer Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International Lizenz
Fachbereich / Einrichtung:Medizinische Fakultät
Dokument erstellt am:18.12.2024
Dateien geändert am:18.12.2024
english
Benutzer
Status: Gast
Aktionen