Dokument: Are we promoting boys and girls equally? An analysis of boys’ and girls’ participation in community prevention

Titel:Are we promoting boys and girls equally? An analysis of boys’ and girls’ participation in community prevention
URL für Lesezeichen:https://docserv.uni-duesseldorf.de/servlets/DocumentServlet?id=74005
URN (NBN):urn:nbn:de:hbz:061-20260721-125053-1
Kollektion:Publikationen
Sprache:Englisch
Dokumententyp:Wissenschaftliche Texte » Artikel, Aufsatz
Medientyp:Text
Autoren: Weyers, Simone [Autor]
Götz, Simon [Autor]
Fischer, Inken [Autor]
Kreffter, Katharina [Autor]
Nguyen, Thuy H. [Autor]
Lisak-Wahl, Stefanie [Autor]
Wessely, Stefanie [Autor]
Joisten, Christine [Autor]
Dateien:
[Dateien anzeigen]Adobe PDF
[Details]734,8 KB in einer Datei
[ZIP-Datei erzeugen]
Dateien vom 21.07.2026 / geändert 21.07.2026
Stichwörter:Community prevention , Social inequalities , Gender , Health promotion
Beschreibung:Aim

Despite consensus that prevention and health promotion need to address gender aspects and differences, not much is known about how boys and girls in infancy (or their parents) make use of existing non-medical community programmes. The aim of the study was therefore to analyse the extent to which boys and girls or their parents in distinct social circumstances participate in respective programmes.
Subject and methods

We conducted secondary analyses for two study samples: The COLIPRE Study includes (n = 6.480) pre-schoolers from Duesseldorf; the SKILLS Study includes (n = 637) pre-schoolers and school children from Cologne. Social circumstances included parental education, employment status, family status, migration background, mother language and neighbourhood deprivation. Prevention participation included programmes for a healthy diet, physical activity, child education and language development. We used Poisson regressions to calculate prevalence ratios (PR) with 95% confidence interval (CI), adjusted for age, siblings and BMI, stratified for boys and girls.
Results

In both studies, we observed no gender differences in general participation. Taking a range of social circumstances into account, we found that boys and girls with specific disadvantages were underrepresented in programmes to promote a healthy diet, physical activity and child education. By contrast, boys and girls with a migration background participate in language promotion programmes more often than their German-native peers.
Conclusion

More effort should be put into developing programmes for boys and girls and their parents in difficult social circumstances.
Rechtliche Vermerke:Originalveröffentlichung:
Weyers, S., Kreffter, K., Götz, S., Nguyen, T. H., Lisak-Wahl, S., Fischer, I., Wessely, S., & Joisten, C. (2022). Are we promoting boys and girls equally? An analysis of boys’ and girls’ participation in community prevention. Journal of Public Health, 31(11), 1875–1883. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-022-01750-y
Lizenz:Creative Commons Lizenzvertrag
Dieses Werk ist lizenziert unter einer Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International Lizenz
Fachbereich / Einrichtung:Medizinische Fakultät
Dokument erstellt am:21.07.2026
Dateien geändert am:21.07.2026
english
Benutzer
Status: Gast
Aktionen