Dokument: The Obvious in a Nutshell: Science, Medicine, Knowledge, and History

Titel:The Obvious in a Nutshell: Science, Medicine, Knowledge, and History
URL für Lesezeichen:https://docserv.uni-duesseldorf.de/servlets/DocumentServlet?id=73861
URN (NBN):urn:nbn:de:hbz:061-20260707-125218-8
Kollektion:Publikationen
Sprache:Englisch
Dokumententyp:Wissenschaftliche Texte » Artikel, Aufsatz
Medientyp:Text
Autoren: De Sio, Fabio [Autor]
Fangerau, Heiner [Autor]
Dateien:
[Dateien anzeigen]Adobe PDF
[Details]504,4 KB in einer Datei
[ZIP-Datei erzeugen]
Dateien vom 07.07.2026 / geändert 07.07.2026
Stichwörter:research , History , education , knowledge , relevance , science , medicine
Beschreibung:The scope and mission of the history of science have been con-
stant objects of reflection and debate within the profession. Recently, Lor-
raine Daston has called for a shift of focus: from the history of science to
the history of knowledge. Such a move is an attempt at broadening the
field and ridding it of the contradictions deriving from its modernist myth
of origin and principle of demarcation. Taking the move from a pluralistic
concept of medicine, the present paper explores the actual and possible
contributions that a history of knowledge can offer to the history of medi-
cine in particular. As we will argue, the history of medicine has always been
a history of knowledge, but for good reasons has always stuck to the con-
cept of medicine as its object and problem throughout the ages, including
the modern, scientific one. We argue that, in the history of medicine, the
demarcation between scientific and non-scientific represents an accident,
but is not foundational as in the case of natural science. Furthermore, the
history of medicine programmatically played a role in at least two academ-
ic domains (history proper and medical education), adjusting historical nar-
ratives of medical knowledge to its audience. Accordingly, we underscore
that the history of both science and medicine, as traditionally defined, al-
ready provides room for almost the whole spectrum of approaches to his-
tory. Moreover, their different myths of origin can, and indeed must, be in-
cluded in the reflexivity of the historical gaze. We argue that the position
towards a history of science, medicine, or knowledge is not a question of
narrative or theory, rather, it is a question of relevance and awareness of
extant contexts.
Rechtliche Vermerke:Originalveröffentlichung:
De Sio, F., & Fangerau, H. (2019). The Obvious in a Nutshell: Science, Medicine, Knowledge, and History. Berichte Zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte, 42(2–3), 167–185. https://doi.org/10.1002/bewi.201900001
Lizenz:Creative Commons Lizenzvertrag
Dieses Werk ist lizenziert unter einer Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International Lizenz
Fachbereich / Einrichtung:Medizinische Fakultät
Dokument erstellt am:07.07.2026
Dateien geändert am:07.07.2026
english
Benutzer
Status: Gast
Aktionen