Dokument: Diaphragmatic stripping versus full-thickness diaphragmatic resection in cytoreductive surgery: a meta-analysis of the current evidence

Titel:Diaphragmatic stripping versus full-thickness diaphragmatic resection in cytoreductive surgery: a meta-analysis of the current evidence
URL für Lesezeichen:https://docserv.uni-duesseldorf.de/servlets/DocumentServlet?id=69294
URN (NBN):urn:nbn:de:hbz:061-20250410-124038-6
Kollektion:Publikationen
Sprache:Englisch
Dokumententyp:Wissenschaftliche Texte » Artikel, Aufsatz
Medientyp:Text
Autoren: Stylianidi, Maria Chiara [Autor]
Vaghiri, Sascha [Autor]
Pandkhahi, Alireza [Autor]
Kazziha, Sultan [Autor]
Al Akeel, Ward [Autor]
Knoefel, Wolfram Trudo [Autor]
Prassas, Dimitrios [Autor]
Dateien:
[Dateien anzeigen]Adobe PDF
[Details]2,24 MB in einer Datei
[ZIP-Datei erzeugen]
Dateien vom 10.04.2025 / geändert 10.04.2025
Stichwörter:Peritoneal carcinomatosis, Diaphragmatic stripping, Full thickness diaphragmatic resection, Diaphragmatic surgery, Cytoreductive surgery, Pulmonary complications
Beschreibung:Purpose

The primary objective was to compare the intra- and postoperative outcomes of diaphragmatic stripping versus full-thickness diaphragmatic resection in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis who underwent cytoreductive surgery.
Methods

According to the PRSIMA guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted for studies comparing postoperative pulmonary complications as well as intra- and postoperative outcomes of diaphragmatic stripping versus full-thickness diaphragmatic resection in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis necessitating cytoreductive surgery. Data from eligible studies were extracted, qualitatively assessed, and included in a meta-analysis. Odds ratios (ORs) and standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95 per cent confidence intervals were calculated.
Results

Ten studies with 1325 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Diaphragmatic stripping was associated with lower incidence of pleural effusion (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.35–0.63, p < 0.00001) and pneumothorax (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.35–0.78, p = 0.002), less severe postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo Grade ≥ 3) (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.30–0.63, p < 0.0001), and shorter duration of surgery (SMD -0.31, 95% CI -0.54 – -0.08, p = 0.007). No significant differences were observed in postoperative subdiaphragmatic abscess occurrence, intraoperative blood loss, hospital- and ICU-stay, and 90-day mortality.
Conclusions

Diaphragmatic stripping leads to a significantly lower rate of postoperative pulmonary and severe complications compared to diaphragmatic full-thickness resection, while oncological outcomes do not appear to be worse. Larger trials with standardized study protocols and long-term survival data are needed to validate the results presented here.
Rechtliche Vermerke:Originalveröffentlichung:
Stylianidi, M. C., Vaghiri, S., Pandkhahi, A., Kazziha, S., Al Akeel, W., Knoefel, W. T., & Prassas, D. (2025). Diaphragmatic stripping versus full-thickness diaphragmatic resection in cytoreductive surgery: a meta-analysis of the current evidence. Langenbeck’s Archives of Surgery, 410, Article 50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-025-03611-0
Lizenz:Creative Commons Lizenzvertrag
Dieses Werk ist lizenziert unter einer Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International Lizenz
Fachbereich / Einrichtung:Medizinische Fakultät
Dokument erstellt am:10.04.2025
Dateien geändert am:10.04.2025
english
Benutzer
Status: Gast
Aktionen