Dokument: Why it is good to communicate the bad: understanding the influence of message framing in persuasive communication on consumer decision-making processes
| Titel: | Why it is good to communicate the bad: understanding the influence of message framing in persuasive communication on consumer decision-making processes | |||||||
| URL für Lesezeichen: | https://docserv.uni-duesseldorf.de/servlets/DocumentServlet?id=68688 | |||||||
| URN (NBN): | urn:nbn:de:hbz:061-20250218-112309-7 | |||||||
| Kollektion: | Publikationen | |||||||
| Sprache: | Englisch | |||||||
| Dokumententyp: | Wissenschaftliche Texte » Artikel, Aufsatz | |||||||
| Medientyp: | Text | |||||||
| Autoren: | Gier, Nadine R. [Autor] Krampe, Caspar [Autor] Kenning, Peter [Autor] | |||||||
| Dateien: |
| |||||||
| Stichwörter: | fMRI, message framing, consumer neuroscience, persuasive communication, sustainable marketing, reflective-impulsive model, brain network perspective, decision-making | |||||||
| Beschreibung: | Introduction: One approach to bridging the gap between consumer intentions and behavior is persuasive communication to reinforce their intentions and thereby support their behavior change. Message framing has proven to be a useful, persuasive communication tool. However, message framing is considered more complicated than other types of framing because, in addition to concept-specific elements, it is also strongly influenced by and, in turn, influences emotions. Therefore, it is almost impossible for consumers to verbally express their attitudes, so the challenge is to explain and measure its impact. This research aims to help in this regard by suggesting a theoretical model to understand how message framing is processed from a consumer neuroscience perspective. More precisely, the factors that constitute message framing are systematized and built on a reflective-impulsive model and a neural emotion-cognition framework interpreted to explain the persuasive effects of message framing.
Method: A functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiment is used to examine the effects of message framing for four different frame types that are hypothesized to affect consumer information processing differently. Result: The results suggest that communication strategies should take into account the valence of the objects and the frame used. The behavioral results partially confirm the assumption that two types of information processing could take place, as suggested by the reflective-impulsive model. At the neural level, using the network perspective, the results show that certain brain regions primarily associated with emotional and cognitive interaction processes are active during processing, depending on the framing of the message. Discussion: In cases of indirect avoidance value-consistent framing, it may be good to communicate the bad in the appropriate frame to influence information processing. | |||||||
| Rechtliche Vermerke: | Originalveröffentlichung:
Gier-Reinartz, N. R., Krampe, C., & Kenning, P. (2023). Why it is good to communicate the bad: understanding the influence of message framing in persuasive communication on consumer decision-making processes. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 17, Article 1085810. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2023.1085810 | |||||||
| Lizenz: |  Dieses Werk ist lizenziert unter einer Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International Lizenz | |||||||
| Fachbereich / Einrichtung: | Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät | |||||||
| Dokument erstellt am: | 18.02.2025 | |||||||
| Dateien geändert am: | 18.02.2025 |
