Dokument: Einfluss einer perioperativen α-adrenergen Rezeptorblockade auf die Komplikationsrate bei der Entfernung katecholaminproduzierender Tumoren

Titel:Einfluss einer perioperativen α-adrenergen Rezeptorblockade auf die Komplikationsrate bei der Entfernung katecholaminproduzierender Tumoren
URL für Lesezeichen:https://docserv.uni-duesseldorf.de/servlets/DocumentServlet?id=53655
URN (NBN):urn:nbn:de:hbz:061-20200708-111500-5
Kollektion:Dissertationen
Sprache:Deutsch
Dokumententyp:Wissenschaftliche Abschlussarbeiten » Dissertation
Medientyp:Text
Autor: Michael Miles Albin Stübs [Autor]
Dateien:
[Dateien anzeigen]Adobe PDF
[Details]548,2 KB in einer Datei
[ZIP-Datei erzeugen]
Dateien vom 04.07.2020 / geändert 04.07.2020
Beitragende:Prof. Kienbaum, Peter [Gutachter]
Prof. Dr. Klenzner, Thomas [Gutachter]
Stichwörter:Phäochromozytom
Dewey Dezimal-Klassifikation:600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften » 610 Medizin und Gesundheit
Beschreibungen:Hintergrund: Patienten mit unbehandeltem Phäochromozytom oder Paragangliom entwickeln in bis zu 20 % der Fälle schwere langfristige kardiovaskuläre Komplikationen wie Arrhythmien und Myokardischämien. Die einzig kausale Therapie ist die operative Tumorentfernung, welche jedoch auf Grund schlecht kontrollierbarer Freisetzung endogener Katecholamine ein hohes Risiko für intraoperative hypertensive Krisen (IHK) und kardiale Arrhythmien birgt. Aus diesem Grund wird im Rahmen aktueller Leitlinien eine prophylaktische perioperative α-adrenerge Rezeptorblockade empfohlen, die jedoch hauptsächlich auf Expertenmeinung beruht. Allerdings treten selbst unter klinisch wirksamer α-adrenerger Rezeptorblockade intraoperative hypertensive Krisen auf. Ferner führt die mit der Tumorresektion einhergehende Elimination der aus dem Tumor freigesetzten Katecholamine zu lebensbedrohlichen Hypotensionen, die einer sorgfältigen Überwachung und Therapie bedürfen.
Methodik: Nach Prüfung durch die Ethikkommission der Ärztekammer Nordrhein (#13-2015) wurden weltweit 21 Zentren (Europa, USA, Australien) durch den Studienleiter aus dem Klinikum Essen-Mitte befragt. In der primären Analyse wurde die Assoziation zwischen einer α-adrenergen Rezeptorblockade und der Rate perioperativer Komplikationen (ein Zusammenschluss mehrerer kardialer und zentralnervöser Ereignisse) untersucht. Des Weiteren wurde der Zusammenhang zwischen einer perioperativen α-adrenergen Rezeptorblockade und den sekundären Endpunkten 1. Inzidenz von IHK über 250 mmHg, und 2. perioperative Letalität, erfasst.
Zusätzlich untersuchten wir im Zentrum Düsseldorf die Assoziation zwischen einer strengeren Definition für IHK mit intraoperativen Blutdrücken über 180 mmHg, die postoperative Intensivstationsverweildauer (ICUVD) und die Krankenhausverweildauer (KHVD) mit einer perioperativen α-adrenergen Rezeptorblockade. Nachdem wir eine Assoziation der α-adrenergen Rezeptorblockade mit einer verlängerten KHVD fanden, führten wir eine multivariable lineare Regressionsanalyse durch, um den Einfluss potenzieller Störgrößen (Alter, hereditäre Erkrankung, Symptomatik, OP-Verfahren, Resektionsausmaß, Lateralität, Periduralanästhesie) zu kontrollieren.
Ergebnisse: Es wurden 1860 Patienten, die sich der Resektion eines Phäochromozytoms oder Paraganglioms unterziehen mussten, retrospektiv ausgewertet. Bei diesen Patienten wurden 1517 Operationen unter perioperativer α-adrenerger Rezeptorblockade durchgeführt (82 %). 1467 Patienten wurden endoskopisch operiert (79 %), bei 393 Patienten wurde ein offener Zugang gewählt (21 %). Alle Patienten erhielten eine Allgemeinanästhesie, 133 Patienten erhielten perioperativ zusätzlich einen Periduralkatheter (7 %). Es zeigte sich eine positive Korrelation zwischen der Gabe einer intraoperativen α-adrenergen Rezeptorblockade und einer erhöhten Häufigkeit perioperativer Komplikationen (p < 0,01). Demgegenüber unterschied sich die Inzidenz intraoperativer Blutdrücke über 250 mmHg und die perioperative Letalität nicht zwischen den Gruppen mit und ohne α-adrenerger Rezeptorblockade. In der Untersuchung der Subgruppe am Zentrum Düsseldorf wurden die Daten von 58 Patienten ausgewertet. 45 Patienten erhielten eine α-adrenerge Rezeptorblockade mit Phenoxybenzamin, 13 Patienten erhielten keine α-adrenerge Rezeptorblockade. Es zeigte sich keine Assoziation zwischen einer α-adrenergen Rezeptorblockade mit IHK > 180 mmHg oder mit der ICUVD, jedoch zwischen einer α-adrenergen Rezeptorblockade und einer Verlängerung der KHVD (p = 0,03). In der multivariablen linearen Regressionsanalyse zeigte sich eine signifikante Verlängerung der KHVD um 8,1 Tage (2,6; 13,6, p < 0,01) in der Gruppe der Patienten mit α-adrenerger Rezeptorblockade, während ein endoskopisches OP-Verfahren die KHVD um 7,0 Tage (-11,6; -2,4, p < 0,01) verkürzte. Diese Einflussgrößen erwiesen sich als unabhängig (p < 0,01).
Schlussfolgerung: Eine perioperative α-adrenerge Rezeptorblockade im Rahmen der operativen Entfernung katecholaminproduzierender Tumoren ist mit einer Erhöhung der perioperativen Komplikationen und einer Verlängerung der KHVD assoziiert. Auf der Basis dieser Ergebnisse sollten die Sicherheit und Effektivität einer perioperativen α-adrenergen Rezeptorblockade im Rahmen prospektiver Studien überprüft werden.

Background: Patients with untreated pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma have an up to 20 % risk to develop severe long-term cardiovascular complications such as arrhythmia and myocardial ischemia. The only causal therapy is surgery to remove the tumor, which, however, bears a high risk of intraoperative hypertensive crisis (IHK) and cardiac arrhythmia due to the release of endogenous catecholamines which is difficult to control. For this reason, in line with current guidelines, a prophylactic perioperative α-adrenergic receptor blocker is recommended, although this is based mainly on expert opinion. However, intraoperative hypertensive crises occur, even under clinically effective α-adrenergic receptor blockers. Furthermore, the reduction of catecholamines following the tumor resection can lead to profound hypotensive crises requiring careful monitoring and therapy.
Methodology: Following examination by the Ethical Review Committee of the Ärztekammer Nordrhein (13-2015), 21 international centers (Europe, USA, Australia) were surveyed by the Klinikum Essen-Mitte in the form of a retrospective questionnaire. In the primary analysis, the association between an alpha-adrenergic receptor blocker and the number of perioperative complications (a combination of several cardiac and central nervous system events) was investigated. In addition, the correlation between a perioperative α-adrenergic receptor blocker and the secondary endpoints 1. incidence of IHK over 250 mmHg and 2. perioperative mortality, was documented.
In the Düsseldorf center we also examined the association between IHC over 180 mmHg, the length of postoperative time spent in the intensive care unit (ICUVD) and the length of time spent in hospital (KHVD) with a perioperative α-adrenergic receptor blocker. After an association of the α-adrenergic receptor blocker with an extended KHVD was identified, a multivariable linear regression analysis was carried out in order to monitor the influence of potential variables (age, hereditary disease, symptoms, surgery procedure, extent of resection, laterality, epidural anesthesia).
Results: 1860 pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma operations were evaluated, 1517 of which were carried out using perioperative α-adrenergic receptor blockers (82%). 1467 patients had an endoscopic procedure (79%), while 393 underwent open surgery (21%). General anesthesia was used in all cases; 133 patients (7%) were also given an epidural catheter in the perioperative period. There was a positive correlation between the administration of intraoperative alpha-adrenergic receptor blockers and an increased frequency of perioperative complications (p < 0.01). The groups with and without alpha-adrenergic receptor blockers showed no difference in the incidence of intraoperative blood pressures of over 250 mmHg and perioperative lethality. In the Düsseldorf center sub-group study, 58 patients’ data were analyzed. 45 patients received α-adrenergic receptor blockers with phenoxybenzamine; 13 patients received no α-adrenergic receptor blockers. The study did not show any association between α-adrenergic receptor blockers and IHK > 180 mmHg or with ICUVD. There was a lengthened KHVD in the group of patients with α-adrenergic receptor blockers in the t-test (p = 0.03). Subsequent multivariable linear regression analysis showed the KHVD lengthened by 8,1 days (2,6; 13,6, p < 0,01) in the group of patients with α-adrenergic receptor blockers while an endoscopic surgical procedure was associated with a shortened KHVD by 7,0 days (-11,6; -2,4, p < 0,01). This association was confirmed to be the independent (p < 0,01).
Conclusion: The use of perioperative α-adrenergic receptor blockers in the context of surgical removal of catecholamine-producing tumors is associated with an increase in perioperative complications and a longer KHVD. Based on these results, the safety and effectiveness of perioperative α-adrenergic receptor blockers should be reviewed in the course of prospective studies.
Quelle:1. Lehnert, H., Regulation of catecholamine synthesizing enzyme gene expression in human pheochromocytoma. Eur J Endocrinol, 1998. 138(4): p. 363-7.
2. Martucci, V.L. and K. Pacak, Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma: diagnosis, genetics, management, and treatment. Curr Probl Cancer, 2014. 38(1): p. 7-41.
3. Lenders, J.W., et al., Phaeochromocytoma. Lancet, 2005. 366(9486): p. 665-75.
4. Maher, E.R., Genetics of phaeochromocytoma. Br Med Bull, 2006. 79-80: p. 141-51.
5. Neumann, H.P., et al., 65 YEARS OF THE DOUBLE HELIX: Genetics informs precision practice in the diagnosis and management of pheochromocytoma. Endocr Relat Cancer, 2018. 25(8): p. T201-T219.
6. O'Riordain, D.S., et al., Clinical spectrum and outcome of functional extraadrenal paraganglioma. World J Surg, 1996. 20(7): p. 916-21; discussion 922.
7. Mundschenk, J. and H. Lehnert, Malignant pheochromocytoma. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes, 1998. 106(5): p. 373-6.
8. Werbel, S.S. and K.P. Ober, Pheochromocytoma. Update on diagnosis, localization, and management. Med Clin North Am, 1995. 79(1): p. 131-53.
9. Lenders, J.W., et al., Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2014. 99(6): p. 1915-42.
10. Manger, T., et al., [Bilateral laparoscopic transperitoneal adrenalectomy in pheochromocytoma]. Langenbecks Arch Chir, 1997. 382(1): p. 37-42.
11. Constantinides, V.A., et al., Systematic review and meta-analysis of retroperitoneoscopic versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Br J Surg, 2012. 99(12): p. 1639-48.
12. Birnbaum, J., A. Giuliano, and A.J. Van Herle, Partial adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma with maintenance of adrenocortical function. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 1989. 69(5): p. 1078-81.
13. Gagner, M., A. Lacroix, and E. Bolte, Laparoscopic adrenalectomy in Cushing's syndrome and pheochromocytoma. N Engl J Med, 1992. 327(14): p. 1033.
14. Gaur, D.D., Laparoscopic operative retroperitoneoscopy: use of a new device. J Urol, 1992. 148(4): p. 1137-9.
15. Conzo, G., et al., Current concepts of pheochromocytoma. Int J Surg, 2014. 12(5): p. 469-74.
16. Walz, M.K., et al., Posterior retroperitoneoscopy as a new minimally invasive approach for adrenalectomy: results of 30 adrenalectomies in 27 patients. World J Surg, 1996. 20(7): p. 769-74.
17. Kinney, M.A., B.J. Narr, and M.A. Warner, Perioperative management of pheochromocytoma. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 2002. 16(3): p. 359-69.
18. Ramakrishna, H., Pheochromocytoma resection: Current concepts in anesthetic management. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol, 2015. 31(3): p. 317-23.
19. Kienbaum, P., et al., Racemic ketamine decreases muscle sympathetic activity but maintains the neural response to hypotensive challenges in humans. Anesthesiology, 2000. 92(1): p. 94-101.
20. Kienbaum, P., et al., S(+)-ketamine increases muscle sympathetic activity and maintains the neural response to hypotensive challenges in humans. Anesthesiology, 2001. 94(2): p. 252-8.
21. Weiskopf, R.B., Cardiovascular effects of desflurane in experimental animals and volunteers. Anaesthesia, 1995. 50 Suppl: p. 14-7.
22. Desmonts, J.M. and J. Marty, Anaesthetic management of patients with phaeochromocytoma. Br J Anaesth, 1984. 56(7): p. 781-9.
23. Vater, M., K. Achola, and G. Smith, Catecholamine responses during anaesthesia for phaeochromocytoma. Br J Anaesth, 1983. 55(4): p. 357-60.
24. Nishina, K., et al., The efficacy of bolus administration of landiolol for attenuating tachycardia in pheochromocytoma. Anesth Analg, 2004. 98(3): p. 876-7; author reply 877-8.
25. Ogata, J., et al., Managing a tachyarrhythmia in a patient with pheochromocytoma with landiolol, a novel ultrashort-acting beta-adrenergic blocker. Anesth Analg, 2003. 97(1): p. 294-5.
26. Plosker, G.L., Landiolol: a review of its use in intraoperative and postoperative tachyarrhythmias. Drugs, 2013. 73(9): p. 959-77.
27. Groeben, H., et al., Perioperative alpha-receptor blockade in phaeochromocytoma surgery: an observational case series. Br J Anaesth, 2017. 118(2): p. 182-189.
28. Daggett, P., I. Verner, and M. Carruthers, Intraoperative management of phaeochromocytoma with sodium nitroprusside. British Medical Journal, 1978. 2(6133): p. 311-313.
29. Tinker, M.D.John H. and M.D.John D. Michenfelder, Sodium NitroprussidePharmacology, Toxicology and Therapeutics. Anesthesiology, 1976. 45(3): p. 340-352.
30. Kanazawa, S., et al., [Low dose vasopressin is effective for catecholamine-resistant hypotension after resection of pheochromocytoma]. Masui, 2013. 62(10): p. 1218-21.
31. Pacak, K., Preoperative management of the pheochromocytoma patient. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2007. 92(11): p. 4069-79.
32. Deetjen, P., E. Speckmann, and J. Hescheler, Physiologie. 4th Edition ed. 2005: Urban & Fischer.
33. Crago, R.M., J.W. Eckholdt, and J.G. Wismell, Pheochromocytoma. Treatment with alpha- and beta-adrenergic blocking drugs. JAMA, 1967. 202(9): p. 870-4.
34. Ross, E.J., et al., Preoperative and operative management of patients with phaeochromocytoma. British Medical Journal, 1967. 1(5534): p. 191-198.
35. Adjalle, R., et al., Treatment of malignant pheochromocytoma. Horm Metab Res, 2009. 41(9): p. 687-96.
36. Lüllmann, H., Taschenatlas Pharmakologie. 2014: Thieme.
37. Frölich, J.C., Kirch, W., Praktische Arzneitherapie. 3. Auflage ed. 2003: Springer Medizin Verlag.
38. Weingarten, T.N., et al., Comparison of two preoperative medical management strategies for laparoscopic resection of pheochromocytoma. Urology, 2010. 76(2): p. 508 e6-11.
39. Kocak, S., S. Aydintug, and N. Canakci, Alpha blockade in preoperative preparation of patients with pheochromocytomas. Int Surg, 2002. 87(3): p. 191-4.
40. Prys-Roberts, C. and J.R. Farndon, Efficacy and safety of doxazosin for perioperative management of patients with pheochromocytoma. World J Surg, 2002. 26(8): p. 1037-42.
41. Briggs, R.S., A.J. Birtwell, and J.E. Pohl, Hypertensive response to labetalol in phaeochromocytoma. Lancet, 1978. 1(8072): p. 1045-6.
42. Neumann, H.P.H., W.F. Young, Jr., and C. Eng, Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma. N Engl J Med, 2019. 381(6): p. 552-565.
43. Bruynzeel, H., et al., Risk Factors for Hemodynamic Instability during Surgery for Pheochromocytoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2010. 95(2): p. 678-85.
44. Namekawa, T., et al., Clinical predictors of prolonged postresection hypotension after laparoscopic adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma. Surgery, 2016. 159(3): p. 763-70.
45. Futier, E., et al., Effect of Individualized vs Standard Blood Pressure Management Strategies on Postoperative Organ Dysfunction Among High-Risk Patients Undergoing Major Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA, 2017. 318(14): p. 1346-1357.
46. Groeben, H., et al., International multicentre review of perioperative management and outcome for catecholamine-producing tumours. BJS (British Journal of Surgery), 2020. 107(2): p. e170-e178.
47. Wren, S.M., et al., Postoperative pneumonia-prevention program for the inpatient surgical ward. J Am Coll Surg, 2010. 210(4): p. 491-5.
48. Rao, F., et al., Catecholamines, Pheochromocytoma, and Hypertension: Genomic Insights. 2007: p. 895-911.
49. Salmasi, V., et al., Relationship between Intraoperative Hypotension, Defined by Either Reduction from Baseline or Absolute Thresholds, and Acute Kidney and Myocardial Injury after Noncardiac Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis. Anesthesiology, 2017. 126(1): p. 47-65.
50. Walsh, M., et al., Relationship between intraoperative mean arterial pressure and clinical outcomes after noncardiac surgery: toward an empirical definition of hypotension. Anesthesiology, 2013. 119(3): p. 507-15.
51. Bijker, J.B. and A.W. Gelb, Review article: the role of hypotension in perioperative stroke. Can J Anaesth, 2013. 60(2): p. 159-67.
52. Mannelli, M., Management and treatment of pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 2006. 1073: p. 405-16.
53. Ramachandran, R. and V. Rewari, Current perioperative management of pheochromocytomas. Indian J Urol, 2017. 33(1): p. 19-25.
54. Thiel, H.e.a., Anästhesiologische Pharmakotherapie. 3. Auflage ed. 2014: Thieme Verlagsgruppe.
55. Shao, Y., et al., Preoperative alpha blockade for normotensive pheochromocytoma: is it necessary? J Hypertens, 2011. 29(12): p. 2429-32.
56. Ulchaker, J.C., et al., Successful outcomes in pheochromocytoma surgery in the modern era. J Urol, 1999. 161(3): p. 764-7.
57. Devereaux, P.J. and D.I. Sessler, Cardiac Complications in Patients Undergoing Major Noncardiac Surgery. N Engl J Med, 2015. 373(23): p. 2258-69.
58. Garcia, M., et al., Surgical and Pharmacological Management of Functioning Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma, in Paraganglioma: A Multidisciplinary Approach, R. Mariani-Costantini, Editor. 2019: Brisbane (AU).
59. Ross, E.J., et al., Preoperative and operative management of patients with phaeochromocytoma. Br Med J, 1967. 1(5534): p. 191-8.
60. Gould, A.B., Jr. and L.B. Perry, The anesthetic management of pheochromocytoma: cases involving nonexplosive techniques, metastatic tumors, and multiple procedures. Anesth Analg, 1972. 51(2): p. 173-6.
61. Young, W.F., Jr., Pheochromocytoma: 1926-1993. Trends Endocrinol Metab, 1993. 4(4): p. 122-7.
62. Goldstein, R.E., et al., Clinical experience over 48 years with pheochromocytoma. Ann Surg, 1999. 229(6): p. 755-64; discussion 764-6.
63. Williams, D.T., S. Dann, and M.H. Wheeler, Phaeochromocytoma--views on current management. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2003. 29(6): p. 483-90.
64. Plouin, P.F., et al., Factors associated with perioperative morbidity and mortality in patients with pheochromocytoma: analysis of 165 operations at a single center. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2001. 86(4): p. 1480-6.
65. Orchard, T., et al., Pheochromocytoma--continuing evolution of surgical therapy. Surgery, 1993. 114(6): p. 1153-8; discussion 1158-9.
66. Strik, C., et al., Risk factors for future repeat abdominal surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2016. 401(6): p. 829-37.
67. Stenstrom, G., H. Haljamae, and L.E. Tisell, Influence of pre-operative treatment with phenoxybenzamine on the incidence of adverse cardiovascular reactions during anaesthesia and surgery for phaeochromocytoma. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 1985. 29(8): p. 797-803.
68. Aggeli, C., et al., Surgery for pheochromocytoma: A 20-year experience of a single institution. Hormones (Athens), 2017. 16(4): p. 388-395.
69. Gil-Cardenas, A., et al., Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: lessons learned from an initial series of 100 patients. Surg Endosc, 2008. 22(4): p. 991-4.
70. Levin, M.A., et al., Intraoperative arterial blood pressure lability is associated with improved 30 day survival. Br J Anaesth, 2015. 115(5): p. 716-26.
71. Brunaud, L., et al., Predictive factors for postoperative morbidity after laparoscopic adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma: a multicenter retrospective analysis in 225 patients. Surg Endosc, 2016. 30(3): p. 1051-9.
72. Stolk, R.F., et al., Is the excess cardiovascular morbidity in pheochromocytoma related to blood pressure or to catecholamines? J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2013. 98(3): p. 1100-6.
Lizenz:In Copyright
Urheberrechtsschutz
Fachbereich / Einrichtung:Medizinische Fakultät
Dokument erstellt am:08.07.2020
Dateien geändert am:08.07.2020
Promotionsantrag am:06.01.2020
Datum der Promotion:01.07.2020
english
Benutzer
Status: Gast
Aktionen