Dokument: Vergleich von Thrombendarteriektomie (TEA) und perkutaner transluminaler Angioplastie (PTA) ostialer- und ostiumnaher, arteriosklerotischer Nierenarterienstenosen – Ergebnisse einer prospektiv randomisierten Studie an 50 Patienten

Titel:Vergleich von Thrombendarteriektomie (TEA) und perkutaner transluminaler Angioplastie (PTA) ostialer- und ostiumnaher, arteriosklerotischer Nierenarterienstenosen – Ergebnisse einer prospektiv randomisierten Studie an 50 Patienten
Weiterer Titel:Operative vs. interventional treatment for ostial renal artery occlusive disease (RAOOD): Results of a prospective randomized trial
URL für Lesezeichen:https://docserv.uni-duesseldorf.de/servlets/DocumentServlet?id=11490
URN (NBN):urn:nbn:de:hbz:061-20090618-110709-1
Kollektion:Dissertationen
Sprache:Deutsch
Dokumententyp:Wissenschaftliche Abschlussarbeiten » Dissertation
Medientyp:Text
Autor: Rossbach, Sebastian [Autor]
Dateien:
[Dateien anzeigen]Adobe PDF
[Details]2,32 MB in einer Datei
[ZIP-Datei erzeugen]
Dateien vom 12.06.2009 / geändert 12.06.2009
Beitragende:Prof. Dr. Sandmann, Wilhelm [Betreuer/Doktorvater]
Prof.Dr. Rump, L. Christian [Gutachter]
Stichwörter:Nierenarterienstenose, OP,TEA, PTA,
Dewey Dezimal-Klassifikation:600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften » 610 Medizin und Gesundheit
Beschreibungen:Einleitung und Ziele
Patienten mit renovaskulärer Hypertonie und/ oder Niereninsuffizienz aufgrund einer ein-oder beidseitigen Nierenarterienstenose(NAST) können sich sowohl einem offen chirurgischen Therapieversuch (Thrombendarteriektomie) oder einer katheterunterstützten Ballondilatation (perkutane transluminale Angioplastie) mit oder ohne Stent unterziehen. Da bisher wenig vergleichende Daten vorliegen, vergleicht die Arbeit beide Verfahren in einer prospektiven, randomisierten Studie im Hinblick auf technischen Erfolg, Offenheitsrate, Nierenfunktion und Komplikationen.

Patienten und Methoden
Zwischen 1998 und 2004 mussteten aus 330 aufeinander folgenden Patienten mit ein- oder beidseitiger arteriosklerotischer NAST, 149 aufgrund eines zweiten erforderlichen Eingriffes ausgeschlossen werden (Kombi-OP), 114 lehnten die Randomisation ab und 17 mussten ausgeschlossen werden, weil entweder die Stenose nicht angemessen für die PTA oder aber der Patient nicht operable war. 50 Patienten (18w/32m, Altersurchschnitt 64,4Jahre) stimmten der Randomisation zu und wurden entweder der offenen Chirurgie (TEA)(n=27) oder aber der PTA  Stent (n=22) Therapie zugelost. 2 Patienten wechselten trotz Randomisation zur chirurgischen Therapie, ein Patient brach die Studie ab.
Bei allen Patienten wurden die Einschlusskriterien für die Studie in einer interdisziplinären Konferenz von Radiologen, Nephrologen und Gefässchirurgen genehmigt. Nachuntersucht wurden die Patienten mittels farbcodierter Duplexsonographie und zusätzlich mittels Angiographie in Fällen mit Verdacht auf Restenose.

Ergebnisse
Insgesamt wurden 77 Arterien behandelt (49 TEA, 28 PTA). Die 4 Jahres-Mortalität lagen bei der OP bei 25%, bei der PTA bei 18%, kein Patient verstarb innerhalb von 30-Tagen. In der offenen chirurgischen Gruppe (TEA) waren 96% technisch erfolgreich, in der PTA  Stent Gruppe waren 90% technisch erfolgreich. Die 4-Jahres-Offenheitsrate (≥70%) der behandelten Nierenarterien betrug 90,1% nach offener Chirurgie und 79,9% nach PTA  Stent Intervention. Beide Gruppen zeigten signifikante Verbesserungen (p<0,0001) des arteriellen Hypertonus und die Nierenfunktion konnte in beiden Gruppen verbessert oder stabilisiert werden.

Schlussfolgerung
Beide Techniken, TEA und PTA mit Stent versprechen zufriedenstellende kurze und mittellange Resultate bei der Therapie von ostialen und ostiumnahen NAST. Die Nierenfunktion und der arterielle Hypertonus können mit beiden Verfahren therapiert werden. Die TEA verspricht signifikant bessere Offenheitsraten als PTA  Stent und bleibt Goldstandard.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with either renovascular hypertension (RVH) and/or renal insufficiency (RI) due to renal artery ostial occlusive disease (RAOOD) can successfully undergo an open surgical reconstruction procedure (OSRP) or percutaneous balloon stent angioplasty (PTRA + stent). However, despite stenting PTRA does not remove the often calcified atheromatosed plaque and a comparison of both treatment modalities concerning complications and durability has never been performed. METHODS: From 1998 to 2004 we performed OSRP in 330 patients with RVH and/or RI for various locations of RAOD. During this time period 50 patients (female 18, male 32, mean age 64, 4 years) with RAOOD of at least 70% stenosis (DSA and duplex criteria) in one or both renal arteries, who did not require other aorto/iliac reconstructive procedures agreed and were randomized to either OSRP or PTRA + stent. Patients were followed on a regular basis for 3 years and longer. End points were re-occurrence of RAOD, impairment of either kidney function or RVH.
RESULTS: We treated 77 arteries (PTRA + stent n=28, OSRP n=49). There was no early mortality in either group, but perioperative morbidity was 13% in the interventional and 4% in the surgical group. Three year follow-up mortality was 18% in the interventional and 25% in the surgical group. Both groups showed significant improvement of RVH (p>0,001 in both groups) as well as improvement or stabilization in patients with impaired renal function. Freedom from recurrent RAOD (>70%) over 3 years was achieved in 90,1% of the surgical and 79,9% of the interventional group(p=0,140).
CONCLUSION: Both treatment modalities showed good early results concerning RVH, kidney function and renal perfusion. Despite a higher number of bilateral renal artery reconstructions in patients undergoing OSRP, which was probably due to the preferred technique of transaortic endarterectomy eliminating the plaque originating in the aorta and usually extending in both renal arteries, mortality was not higher and procedure related morbidity was even lower compared to PTRA + stent. These findings and also better durability of OSRP imply, that surgical reconstruction remains the gold standard for patients with RAOOD before PTRA + stent may be considered.
Quelle:1. Harding, M.B., et al., Renal artery stenosis: prevalence and associated risk factors in patients undergoing routine cardiac catheterization. J Am Soc Nephrol, 1992. 2(11): p. 1608-16.
2. Safian, R.D. and S.C. Textor, Renal-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med, 2001. 344(6): p. 431-42.
3. Lenz T, Ischämische Nephropathie - eine häufig verkannte Diagnose? J nephrol Team, 2004. 3/4: p. 141-149.
4. Spitthöver R, S.F., Neumann K,Henseke P, Philipp Th, Müller RD,, Klinischer Stellenwert der Computertomographie-Angiographie in der Diagnostik von Nierenarterienstenosen. Nieren- und Hochdruckkrankheiten, 2000. 6: p. 245-252.
5. Herberer G, Chirurgische Therapie der Eingeweidearterienverschlüsse und der Bauchaortenaneurysmen.; Surgery of mesenteric arterial occlusions and abdominal aortic aneurysms
Verhandlungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Innere Medizin
1972. 1(1): p. 580.
6. SURGICAL HISTORY. ANZ Journal of Surgery
2005. 75(s1): p. A103.
7. Hippokrates, Der Arzt - Übersetzung aus dem Griechischen. Hippokrates Schriften. Die Anfänge der abendländischen Medizin., 400 v Chr.
8. Friedman SG, A History of Vascular Surgery. 1989, Mount Kisco, New York: Futura publishing GmbH.
9. Vesalius A, Opera omnia anatomica et chirurgica. 1543.
10. Zimmermann LM, V.I., Great ideas in the history of surgery
1961.
11. Rüster D, Alte Chirurgie - Legende und Wirklichkeit. 1984, Berlin: Verlag Volk und Gesundheit. 255.
12. Hejazi SN, Historisches der Medizin. Hessisches Ärzteblatt, 2001. 8: p. 379-381.
13. Schreiber, M.J., M.A. Pohl, and A.C. Novick, The natural history of atherosclerotic and fibrous renal artery disease. Urol Clin North Am, 1984. 11(3): p. 383-92.
14. Muller, B.T., et al., Surgical treatment of renal artery dissection in 25 patients: indications and results. J Vasc Surg, 2003. 37(4): p. 761-8.
15. Cheung, C.M., et al., Epidemiology of renal dysfunction and patient outcome in atherosclerotic renal artery occlusion. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2002. 13(1): p. 149-57.
16. Conlon, P.J., E. O'Riordan, and P.A. Kalra, New insights into the epidemiologic and clinical manifestations of atherosclerotic renovascular disease. Am J Kidney Dis, 2000. 35(4): p. 573-87.
17. Textor, S.C., Epidemiology and clinical presentation. Semin Nephrol, 2000. 20(5): p. 426-31.
18. Hollenbeck, M., et al., Arteriosclerotic renal artery stenosis. Significance, diagnosis and therapy options. Med Klin, 2002. 97(6): p. 335-43.
19. Rundback, J.H., et al., Guidelines for the reporting of renal artery revascularization in clinical trials. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2003. 14(9 Pt 2): p. S477-92.
20. Krumme, B., et al., Diagnosis of renovascular disease by intra- and extrarenal Doppler scanning. Kidney Int, 1996. 50(4): p. 1288-92.
21. Mann, F., et al., The effect on the blood flow of decreasing the lumen of a blood vessel. Surgery, 1938. 4: p. 249-255.
22. Voiculescu, A., et al., Renovascular disease: a review of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Minerva Urol Nefrol, 2006. 58(3): p. 127-49.
23. Schiebler, S., Zilles, Anatomie. 1999: Springer Verlag. 890.
24. Ouriel, K., et al., Acute renal artery occlusion: when is revascularization justified? J Vasc Surg, 1987. 5(2): p. 348-55.
25. Imanishi, M., et al., Critical degree of renal arterial stenosis that causes hypertension in dogs. Angiology, 1992. 43(10): p. 833-42.
26. Voiculescu, A. and B. Grabensee, [Diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of renal artery stenosis]. Med Klin (Munich), 2006. 101 Suppl 1: p. 153-7.
27. Pickering, T.B., JD, Renovascular hypertension and ischemic nephropathy, in The Kidney, B. Brenner, Editor. 2000, W.B. Saunders Company. p. 2007-2031.
28. Farmer, C.K., et al., Individual kidney function before and after renal angioplasty. Lancet, 1998. 352(9124): p. 288-9.
29. Zierler, R.E., et al., A prospective study of disease progression in patients with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis. Am J Hypertens, 1996. 9(11): p. 1055-61.
30. Caps, M.T., et al., Prospective study of atherosclerotic disease progression in the renal artery. Circulation, 1998. 98(25): p. 2866-72.
31. Baboolal, K., C. Evans, and R.H. Moore, Incidence of end-stage renal disease in medically treated patients with severe bilateral atherosclerotic renovascular disease. Am J Kidney Dis, 1998. 31(6): p. 971-7.
32. Koch J A, H.M., Jung G, Diagnostik und Therapie der Nierenarterienstenose. Radiologie up2date, 2006. 6(1): p. 69.
33. Nelemans, P.J., et al., The cost-effectiveness of the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis. Eur J Radiol, 1998. 27(2): p. 95-107.
34. Handa, N., et al., Efficacy of echo-Doppler examination for the evaluation of renovascular disease. Ultrasound Med Biol, 1988. 14(1): p. 1-5.
35. Hansen, K.J., et al., Renal duplex sonography: evaluation of clinical utility. J Vasc Surg, 1990. 12(3): p. 227-36.
36. Kliewer MA, T.R., Carroll BA, Renal srtery stenosis: analysis of doppler waveform parameters and tardus-parvus pattern. Radiollgy, 1993(189): p. 779-787.
37. Radermacher, J., et al., Detection of significant renal artery stenosis with color Doppler sonography: combining extrarenal and intrarenal approaches to minimize technical failure. Clin Nephrol, 2000. 53(5): p. 333-43.
38. Helenon, O., et al., Color Doppler US of renovascular disease in native kidneys. Radiographics, 1995. 15(4): p. 833-54; discussion 854-65.
39. Radermacher, J., et al., Use of Doppler ultrasonography to predict the outcome of therapy for renal-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med, 2001. 344(6): p. 410-7.
40. Zeller, T., et al., Stent angioplasty of severe atherosclerotic ostial renal artery stenosis in patients with diabetes mellitus and nephrosclerosis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2003. 58(4): p. 510-5.
41. Zeller, T., et al., [Color duplex ultrasound imaging of renal arteries and detection of hemodynamically relevant renal artery stenoses]. Ultraschall Med, 2001. 22(3): p. 116-21.
42. Korosec FR, M.C., MR angiography: basic principles and theory. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am, 1998(6): p. 223-256.
43. Stehling MK, N.M., Laub G, Kontrastmittelverstärkte Magnetresonanzangiographie
Radiologie 1997(37): p. 501-507.
44. De Cobelli, F., et al., Renal artery stenosis: evaluation with breath-hold, three-dimensional, dynamic, gadolinium-enhanced versus three-dimensional, phase-contrast MR angiography. Radiology, 1997. 205(3): p. 689-95.
45. Steffens JC, L.J., Grässner J, Mueller-Huelsbeck S, Brinkmann G, Reuter M, Heller M, Contrast-enhanced, K-Space-centered, breath-hold MR angiography of the renal arteries and the abdominal aorta
J Magn Reson Imaging
1997
7(4): p. 617-622.
46. Kawashima A, S.C., Ernst RD, CT evaluation of renovaskular disease. Radiographics, 2000(20): p. 1321-1340.
47. Vasbinder, G.B., et al., Accuracy of computed tomographic angiography and magnetic resonance angiography for diagnosing renal artery stenosis. Ann Intern Med, 2004. 141(9): p. 674-82; discussion 682.
48. Voiculescu, A., et al., Noninvasive investigation for renal artery stenosis: contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and color Doppler sonography as compared to digital subtraction angiography. Clin Exp Hypertens, 2001. 23(7): p. 521-31.
49. Prokop, M., CT angiography of the abdominal arteries. Abdom Imaging, 1998. 23(5): p. 462-8.
50. Schunk K, Grundlagen angiogrphischer Technik. Angiographie, 2003. 3.
51. Barrett, B.J., Contrast nephrotoxicity. J Am Soc Nephrol, 1994. 5(2): p. 125-37.
52. Mann, S.J., et al., Captopril renography in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis: accuracy and limitations. Am J Med, 1991. 90(1): p. 30-40.
53. Kaufmann JJ, Renovascular Hypertension: The UCLA Experience
Journal Urologica, 1979. 121: p. 139-144.
54. Taylor AT, F.J., Nally JV, Blaufox MD, Dubovsky EV, Fine EJ, Kahn D, Morton KA, Russell CD, Skafianakis GN, Aurell M, Dondi M, Fommei E, Geyskes G, Granerus G, Oei HY, Procedure Guideline for Diagnosis of Renovascular Hypertension
Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 1998(39): p. 1297-1302.
55. Plouin, P.F., et al., Blood pressure outcome of angioplasty in atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: a randomized trial. Essai Multicentrique Medicaments vs Angioplastie (EMMA) Study Group. Hypertension, 1998. 31(3): p. 823-9.
56. van Jaarsveld, B.C., et al., The effect of balloon angioplasty on hypertension in atherosclerotic renal-artery stenosis. Dutch Renal Artery Stenosis Intervention Cooperative Study Group. N Engl J Med, 2000. 342(14): p. 1007-14.
57. Webster, J., et al., Randomised comparison of percutaneous angioplasty vs continued medical therapy for hypertensive patients with atheromatous renal artery stenosis. Scottish and Newcastle Renal Artery Stenosis Collaborative Group. J Hum Hypertens, 1998. 12(5): p. 329-35.
58. Dotter, C.T. and M.P. Judkins, Transluminal Treatment Of Arteriosclerotic Obstruction. Description Of A New Technic And A Preliminary Report Of Its Application. Circulation, 1964. 30: p. 654-70.
59. Kaukanen, E.T., et al., Brachial artery access for percutaneous renal artery interventions. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 1997. 20(5): p. 353-8.
60. McNeil, J.W., S.T. String, and R.B. Pfeiffer, Jr., Concomitant renal endarterectomy and aortic reconstruction. J Vasc Surg, 1994. 20(3): p. 331-6; discussion 336-7.
61. Dean, R.H., Oskin, T.C., Surgery of the renal arteries. Indication, technique, and results. Gefässchirurgie, 2000(5): p. 6-13.
62. Steinbach, F., et al., Long-term survival after surgical revascularization for atherosclerotic renal artery disease. J Urol, 1997. 158(1): p. 38-41.
63. Torsello, G., et al., Results of surgical treatment for atherosclerotic renovascular occlusive disease. Eur J Vasc Surg, 1990. 4(5): p. 477-82.
64. Pfeiffer, T., et al., Reconstruction for renal artery aneurysm: operative techniques and long-term results. J Vasc Surg, 2003. 37(2): p. 293-300.
65. Reiher, L., Langzeitergebnisse nach gefäßchirurgischer Rekonstruktion der Nierenarterien, in PhD Thesis. 2001, Heinrich Heine University: Duesseldorf.
66. Bonelli, F.S., et al., Renal artery angioplasty: technical results and clinical outcome in 320 patients. Mayo Clin Proc, 1995. 70(11): p. 1041-52.
67. Pfeiffer, T., et al., Aortoiliac reconstruction after kidney transplantation. Strategies to avoid ischemic damage of the transplant. Chirurg, 2002. 73(1): p. 57-64.
68. Weibull, H., et al., Percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty versus surgical reconstruction of atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: a prospective randomized study. J Vasc Surg, 1993. 18(5): p. 841-50; discussion 850-2.
69. Galaria, II, et al., Percutaneous and open renal revascularizations have equivalent long-term functional outcomes. Ann Vasc Surg, 2005. 19(2): p. 218-28.
70. Branchereau, A., et al., Simultaneous reconstruction of infrarenal abdominal aorta and renal arteries. Ann Vasc Surg, 1992. 6(3): p. 232-8.
71. Van Damme, H., et al., Surgery for occlusive renal artery disease: immediate and long-term results. Acta Chir Belg, 1995. 95(1): p. 1-10.
72. Hansen, K.J., et al., Contemporary surgical management of renovascular disease. J Vasc Surg, 1992. 16(3): p. 319-30; discussion 330-1.
73. Anderson, C.A., et al., Renal artery fibromuscular dysplasia: results of current surgical therapy. J Vasc Surg, 1995. 22(3): p. 207-15; discussion 215-6.
74. Carmo, M., et al., Surgical management of renal fibromuscular dysplasia: challenges in the endovascular era. Ann Vasc Surg, 2005. 19(2): p. 208-17.
75. Tuttle, K.R., et al., Treatment of atherosclerotic ostial renal artery stenosis with the intravascular stent. Am J Kidney Dis, 1998. 32(4): p. 611-22.
76. Rodriguez-Lopez, J.A., et al., Renal artery stenosis treated with stent deployment: indications, technique, and outcome for 108 patients. J Vasc Surg, 1999. 29(4): p. 617-24.
77. Lederman, R.J., et al., Primary renal artery stenting: characteristics and outcomes after 363 procedures. Am Heart J, 2001. 142(2): p. 314-23.
78. Gill, K.S. and R.C. Fowler, Atherosclerotic renal arterial stenosis: clinical outcomes of stent placement for hypertension and renal failure. Radiology, 2003. 226(3): p. 821-6.
79. Henry, M., et al., Stents in the treatment of renal artery stenosis: long-term follow-up. J Endovasc Surg, 1999. 6(1): p. 42-51.
80. White, C.J., et al., Renal artery stent placement: utility in lesions difficult to treat with balloon angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1997. 30(6): p. 1445-50.
81. Darling, R.C., 3rd, et al., Outcome of renal artery reconstruction: analysis of 687 procedures. Ann Surg, 1999. 230(4): p. 524-30; discussion 530-2.
82. Paty, P.S., et al., Is prosthetic renal artery reconstruction a durable procedure? An analysis of 489 bypass grafts. J Vasc Surg, 2001. 34(1): p. 127-32.
83. Cherr, G.S., et al., Surgical management of atherosclerotic renovascular disease. J Vasc Surg, 2002. 35(2): p. 236-45.
84. Taylor, S.M., et al., Concomitant renal revascularization with aortic surgery: are the risks of combined procedures justified? Am Surg, 2000. 66(8): p. 768-72.
85. Cambria, R.P., et al., The durability of different reconstructive techniques for atherosclerotic renal artery disease. J Vasc Surg, 1994. 20(1): p. 76-85; discussion 86-7.
86. Allen, B.T., et al., Simultaneous surgical management of aortic and renovascular disease. Am J Surg, 1993. 166(6): p. 726-32; discussion 732-3.
87. Dorros, G., et al., Four-year follow-up of Palmaz-Schatz stent revascularization as treatment for atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis. Circulation, 1998. 98(7): p. 642-7.
88. Bredenberg, C.E., et al., Changing patterns in surgery for chronic renal artery occlusive diseases. J Vasc Surg, 1992. 15(6): p. 1018-23; discussion 1023-4.
89. Benjamin, M.E., et al., Combined aortic and renal artery surgery. A contemporary experience. Ann Surg, 1996. 223(5): p. 555-65; discussion 565-7.
90. Lamawansa, M.D., R. Bell, and A.K. House, Short-term and long-term outcome following renovascular reconstruction. Cardiovasc Surg, 1995. 3(1): p. 50-5.
91. Clair, D.G., et al., Safety and efficacy of transaortic renal endarterectomy as an adjunct to aortic surgery. J Vasc Surg, 1995. 21(6): p. 926-33; discussion 934.
92. Dougherty, M.J., et al., Renal endarterectomy vs. bypass for combined aortic and renal reconstruction: is there a difference in clinical outcome? Ann Vasc Surg, 1995. 9(1): p. 87-94.
93. Atnip, R.G., et al., Combined aortic and visceral arterial reconstruction: risks and results. J Vasc Surg, 1990. 12(6): p. 705-14; discussion 714-5.
94. Hassen-Khodja, R., et al., Renal artery revascularization in combination with infrarenal aortic reconstruction. Ann Vasc Surg, 2000. 14(6): p. 577-82.
95. Zierler, R.E., et al., Natural history of atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: a prospective study with duplex ultrasonography. J Vasc Surg, 1994. 19(2): p. 250-7; discussion 257-8.
96. Marone, L.K., et al., Preservation of renal function with surgical revascularization in patients with atherosclerotic renovascular disease. J Vasc Surg, 2004. 39(2): p. 322-9.
97. Burket, M.W., et al., Renal artery angioplasty and stent placement: predictors of a favorable outcome. Am Heart J, 2000. 139(1 Pt 1): p. 64-71.
98. Davidson, R.A., Y. Barri, and C.S. Wilcox, Predictors of cure of hypertension in fibromuscular renovascular disease. Am J Kidney Dis, 1996. 28(3): p. 334-8.
99. Tsoukas, A.I., et al., Simultaneous aortic replacement and renal artery revascularization: the influence of preoperative renal function on early risk and late outcome. J Vasc Surg, 2001. 34(6): p. 1041-9.
100. Radermacher, J., S. Ellis, and H. Haller, Renal resistance index and progression of renal disease. Hypertension, 2002. 39(2 Pt 2): p. 699-703.
101. Radermacher, J., S. Ellis, and H. Haller, Renal resistance index and progression of renal disease. Hypertension, 2002. 39(2 Pt 2): p. 699-703.
102. Jensen, G., et al., Treatment of renovascular hypertension: one year results of renal angioplasty. Kidney Int, 1995. 48(6): p. 1936-45.
Lizenz:In Copyright
Urheberrechtsschutz
Bezug:1998-2009
Fachbereich / Einrichtung:Medizinische Fakultät
Dokument erstellt am:18.06.2009
Dateien geändert am:12.06.2009
Promotionsantrag am:17.06.2008
Datum der Promotion:10.06.2009
english
Benutzer
Status: Gast
Aktionen